Response to the Star Article
While I was—and still am—inclined to dismiss the “article” that appeared about Wabash in the Indianapolis Star last month, that didn’t stop Bob Hobson ’57 from clarifying a few points. What follows is his letter to the article’s author. Enjoy.
Dear Staci,
I read with only passing interest your piece in the Sunday, November 19, 2006 Indianapolis Star. I concluded it was simply a follow-up to the interest generated by the Wabash-DePauw football game on November 11. But after receiving other information I am curious whether your piece was a planned follow up to a letter written by a disgruntled visiting Wabash instructor named Karolyn Kinane, complaining of rampant sexism on campus. Ms. Kinane seems to be a rather ungrateful visitor in light of the unflattering remarks she has made about her host, Wabash College.
Back to your article, you seem to indicate that the only invited guest speakers at Wabash are those with viewpoints such as the Harvard University professor who believes that men are not cut out for housework. Quite to the contrary, a large number of feminists, socialists and other anti-men’s college speakers are regularly invited to speak at Wabash. The only balance is maintained by a campus publication, the Wabash Commentary, which brings more traditional speakers to Wabash, at private expenditures, not funded by the College.
You mentioned old-fashioned traditions distinguishing Wabash. Pray tell what other types of traditions are there than old-fashioned ones? This was mentioned in the context of Wabash being only one of two men’s four-year colleges in the nation. May I call your attention to Morehouse College in Atlanta, Georgia? Or does Morehouse not count because it is an all male African American college?
You mentioned that many faculty members worry the cloistered campus fosters a chauvinist culture. I do not remember any walls or fences at Wabash. I always found it easy to visit Greencastle (DePauw University), West Lafayette (Purdue University), Muncie (Ball State University), Indianapolis (Butler University) and other close locations for culture. But remember, Crawfordsville, itself, is a historic location with much in the way of Indiana culture to be found. Have you ever tried a week-end in Crawfordsville and its environs? You should give it a try.
I have never felt the Wabash campus was a cloistered environment, either while I was a student there or upon my many return visits to the campus. If you want to see a cloistered university, try Sewanee which is also known also as the University of the South. Now there is cloistered.
It is interesting that so many of the Wabash faculty describe the climate there as intolerant. It is really too bad that they feel they are “captured” on an intolerant campus with no way to escape. Maybe tenure keeps them there and they fear they do not have the mobility to go where they would feel more comfortable. Alas, when I have been employed in an atmosphere I considered “intolerant,” I moved on. Perhaps we could invite the same action to those who so strongly dislike the climate at Wabash.
You mentioned that one professor, John Aden, who graduated from Wabash, indicated that people are expecting equality. That is not what I expected when I enrolled at Wabash and I do not think that is what the people I know expect. We expect EXCELLENCE, not equality. Now Professor Aden should not complain too much about the intolerant climate at Wabash since he graduated from Wabash.
You indicated that nearly all 90 of the faculty signed a letter saying that conflict on the campus spurred at least two faculty members and four students to leave Wabash last spring. My information indicates that it was 28 liberal professors who signed the letter. Far fewer than the 90 indicated, and it is probably best that the 2 faculty and 4 students left. Wabash is not for everyone. Most people realize that and are happy to be accepted at Wabash. It is good that those who realize Wabash is not for them can move on to find what they really want. After all, there are hundreds (perhaps thousands) of institutions of higher education in this country. Not one fits all and, of course, Wabash is one that does not fit all.
You concluded with Ms. Kinane’s belief in Wabash’s masculine heritage, b= ut there’s this tiptoeing around trying to figure out an identity. With all of her complaints, I was surprised at that. Then you ask, “Are we stepping into the 21st century or are we holding onto our traditions?”
Well, the answers are:
- As to identity:
Wabash is a men’s college providing an excellent opportunity for the education of young men.
This is quite plain and simple. There is nothing more and nothing less. Look to the results (as you did in pointing out some of the highly successful graduates Wabash has had). You only mentioned a very few. You could write another article about the many more.
- Are we stepping into the 21st century or holding onto our traditions:
YES!! YES to BOTH questions. YES, Wabash is stepping boldly into the 21st century and YES, Wabash is proudly holding on to its traditions.
Are you planning any follow up articles on sexism at women’s colleges? Remember there are many, many more women’s colleges in the country than men’s colleges. Are they cloistered? Is there rampant sexism (it works both ways) at women’s colleges? Do women need men coeds to assure they properly adjust to the world? Do women’s colleges find it easier to study without the distraction of men? Are there any faculty members at women’s colleges who find it difficult to teach only the one sex? If 25% of the Wabash faculty are women, what is the percentage of men teaching at women’s colleges. What kind of speakers do they have at women’s colleges? Do they have speakers advocating the excellence of men? Here is one you could devote a whole article to: the many women who have attended women’s colleges and have gone on to illustrious careers in business and government. Is there a women’s college who has but one rule of conduct: conduct yourself as a lady at all times? Are there traditions at women’s colleges that professors criticize, such as wearing “pots” or other such? Have there been faculty members and students who leave women’s colleges because they are single sex? Can young women learn to be effective leaders without men on campus? Would it be hard to develop a woman “with emotional intelligence or the social skills necessary” without men in the student body, as Gar Kellom, vice president of St. John’s University states? Do they offer courses in masculinism at women’s colleges? If not, why not? Are there courses in masculine appreciation at women’s colleges? Are there courses in Masculine Theory at women’s colleges? Are professors at women’s colleges petitioning to review the campus climate at women’s colleges and do some find it intolerant? If not, why not? Are women’s colleges considered to be pretty much in the 19th century? After all, coeducation has been around for a long time. Do people at women’s colleges expect “equality” or are they more interested in EXCELLENCE? What is the social life like at women’s colleges? Have there been any visiting professors at women’s colleges who complain about the lack of diversity in the student body and write letters to the host school’s newspaper complaining?
I really hope to see your follow up articles on these subjects.
Have a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.
Bob Hobson
Wabash Class of 1957
I read with only passing interest your piece in the Sunday, November 19, 2006 Indianapolis Star. I concluded it was simply a follow-up to the interest generated by the Wabash-DePauw football game on November 11. But after receiving other information I am curious whether your piece was a planned follow up to a letter written by a disgruntled visiting Wabash instructor named Karolyn Kinane, complaining of rampant sexism on campus. Ms. Kinane seems to be a rather ungrateful visitor in light of the unflattering remarks she has made about her host, Wabash College.

Esquire is one of my favorite magazines. It's doesn't have that juvenile sense of girl-lust like Maxim, it's not so dense like the New Yorker, and it's not fashion-obsessed like GQ. What it does have—month in and month out—is great writing. Case in point: writer-at-large Tom Junod's September 2003 essay entitled, "